SDDP UCYVROK Romania - Descriptors: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ1) was: </u><br>
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ1) was: </u><br>
'''What are descriptors of an ideal society that is culturally diverse and inclusive?'''<br>
'''What are descriptors of an ideal society that is culturally diverse and inclusive?'''<br>
In response to the TQ1, the 12 participants came up with 67 characteristics, which were categorized in 11 clusters. Following the voting process, 27 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
 
Having classified all ideas according to the clusters, all participants voted for their five most favourable descriptors. The votes are widely spread across the descriptors. The descriptors that received most votes were:
*Possibility for education for everyone in the world;
*Citizenship education is a key course in schools;
*All the people are living in a healthy environment;
*People will feel secure everywhere;
*The citizens are participating in the decision making process;
 
The voting results were used to select ideas for the subsequent structuring process. The participants managed to structure 27
descriptors that received one or more votes and were selected important according to their interrelations.
 
The result is the created ‘influence pattern’, showing the root causes facilitating an ideal society which is culturally diverse and inclusive due to the provision of equal education for everybody in the world. The influence pattern consists of five different levels of influence.
 
The pattern of influence developed in this first part of the workshop is divided into five
different levels of influence. Descriptors at the bottom are considered to be most
influential. Making progress or achieving results in those bottom descriptors makes it a
lot easier to address those that lie higher in the map.
 
 
==Participants==
{|border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" align="left"
|-
! scope="col" style="background:#efefef;" align="left"| Name
! scope="col" style="background:#efefef;" align="left"| Country
|-
|Andrzej Szozda
|Poland
|-
|Piotv Olsolzki
|Poland
|-
|Oana Nestian
|Romania
|-
|Daniela Cracihn
|Romania
|-
|Paulina Vitovicova
|Slovakia
|-
|Marta Hanecakova
|Slovakia
|-
|Zsofia Szalai
|Hungary
|-
|Kinga Szebegynszki
|Hungary
|-
|Santa Grinberga
|Latvia
|-
|Svetozar Daskalov
|Bulgaria
|-
|Tsena Zhelyazkova
|Bulgaria
|}
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


==External Links==
==External Links==

Revision as of 06:47, 28 November 2012

SDDP Uniting for Citizenship and participation:Youth promoting Vulnerable Groups’ Rights,

Opportunities and Knowledge

SDDP Uniting for Citizenship and participation:Youth promoting Vulnerable Groups’ Rights, Opportunities and Knowledge
Report Title Youth promoting Vulnerable Groups’ Rights, Opportunities and Knowledge
Project UCYVROK - Uniting for Citizenship and Participation
Triggering Question 1)What are descriptors of an ideal society that is culturally diverse and inclusive?


2)What are obstacles that prevent us from reaching our ideal society that is culturally diverse and inclusive?

Dates 21-22 SEP, 2010
Author(s) Larry Fergeson
Kerstin Wittig
Yiannis Laouris
Total Duration xx person hrs
Statistics Participants=12
TQ1:Number of ideas=67
Number of Clusters=11
Ideas received Votes=27
Ideas on MAP R=xx
Spreathink ST=
Situational Complexity SCI=
TQ2:
Number of ideas=72
Number of Clusters=9
Ideas received Votes= 20
Ideas on MAP R=
Spreathink ST=
Situational Complexity SCI=
Download Romania Final Report



Executive Summary


This interactive workshop based on the Structured Dialogic Design Process (SDDP) was organised as part of the project “Uniting for Citizenship and participation: Youth promoting Vulnerable group’s Rights, Opportunities and Knowledge (UCYVROK)”. The main aim of this project is to inform and mobilise young individuals from less privileged groups and actively promote youth citizenship. The project also aims at promoting feelings of solidarity, communication and understanding among youths of Europe and together work towards promoting European cooperation. The project engages stakeholders to exchange expertise and share best practices of youth organisations working on issues of cultural diversity, human rights, inclusion, empowerment and active citizenship. The main goal is to develop a joint vision of European Youth based on generally abiding principles of human rights, inclusion and cultural diversity. The project team will also develop a Joint Action Plan encouraging increased participation of less privileged youth in European led activities.


The Triggering Question (TQ1) was:
What are descriptors of an ideal society that is culturally diverse and inclusive?

Having classified all ideas according to the clusters, all participants voted for their five most favourable descriptors. The votes are widely spread across the descriptors. The descriptors that received most votes were:

  • Possibility for education for everyone in the world;
  • Citizenship education is a key course in schools;
  • All the people are living in a healthy environment;
  • People will feel secure everywhere;
  • The citizens are participating in the decision making process;

The voting results were used to select ideas for the subsequent structuring process. The participants managed to structure 27 descriptors that received one or more votes and were selected important according to their interrelations.

The result is the created ‘influence pattern’, showing the root causes facilitating an ideal society which is culturally diverse and inclusive due to the provision of equal education for everybody in the world. The influence pattern consists of five different levels of influence.

The pattern of influence developed in this first part of the workshop is divided into five different levels of influence. Descriptors at the bottom are considered to be most influential. Making progress or achieving results in those bottom descriptors makes it a lot easier to address those that lie higher in the map.


Participants

Name Country
Andrzej Szozda Poland
Piotv Olsolzki Poland
Oana Nestian Romania
Daniela Cracihn Romania
Paulina Vitovicova Slovakia
Marta Hanecakova Slovakia
Zsofia Szalai Hungary
Kinga Szebegynszki Hungary
Santa Grinberga Latvia
Svetozar Daskalov Bulgaria
Tsena Zhelyazkova Bulgaria















External Links

References