The 2015 International Conference on the Science of Dialogic Design: Symposia for Scientists and Practitioners: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 104: Line 104:
-- if it is possible that "different strokes are required for different folks",  how is this consideration to be recognized and integrated, especially if those marginalized by SDD strenuously object in some way
-- if it is possible that "different strokes are required for different folks",  how is this consideration to be recognized and integrated, especially if those marginalized by SDD strenuously object in some way


-- What questions remain unasked in framing the [[Science of Dialogic Design|SDD]] initiative -- as they are in the framing of initiatives by others -- and how do such questions constrain the wider appreciation of the outcome
-- What questions remain unasked in framing the [[Science of Dialogic Design|SDD]] initiative -- as they are in the framing of initiatives by others -- and how do such questions constrain the wider appreciation of the outcome (some arguments in favor of hypothesis that it is the ontological questions concerning the structure and transformation of social systems which remain most often unasked are available to all interested at https://www.academia.edu/12128715/Ontological_questions_of_a_Structural_Dialogical_Design_apprentice_concerning_SDD_Axioms_from_sociology_of_knowledge_perspective ).


The deliberations at the gathering will address all four domains of the DOSM, i.e., the Foundation, Theory, Methodology, and Applications, in order to ensure the evolution of the science in accordance to the tenants of this model, as described in the [[referential transparency paper]] posted at the link: http://dialogicdesignscience.wikispaces.com/Laws+(7)
The deliberations at the gathering will address all four domains of the DOSM, i.e., the Foundation, Theory, Methodology, and Applications, in order to ensure the evolution of the science in accordance to the tenants of this model, as described in the [[referential transparency paper]] posted at the link: http://dialogicdesignscience.wikispaces.com/Laws+(7)