5,695
edits
The 2015 International Conference on the Science of Dialogic Design: Symposia for Scientists and Practitioners: Difference between revisions
From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
The 2015 International Conference on the Science of Dialogic Design: Symposia for Scientists and Practitioners (view source)
Revision as of 06:21, 13 July 2014
, 13 July 2014no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
<u>Positioning SDD within the framework of other systems science methodologies and approaches</u> | <u>Positioning SDD within the framework of other systems science methodologies and approaches</u> | ||
Important questions:<br> | |||
questions such as the following: | questions such as the following: | ||
* Is SDD the appropriate response at this time and necessarily the preferred over others? | |||
* Can SDD contribute towards reaching a global consensus? | |||
* When and how is SDD complementary to other approaches offering other insights? | |||
* How can we best interrelate complementary approaches, each with a tendency to consider that it is of primary value -- especially in seeking to reinforce that perspective through the gathering | |||
-- supposing that significant support for SDD emerged as a consequence of the exercise, how is it assumed that the cases for marginalizing other approaches (considered to be of lesser relevance) would be undertaken | -- supposing that significant support for SDD emerged as a consequence of the exercise, how is it assumed that the cases for marginalizing other approaches (considered to be of lesser relevance) would be undertaken | ||
| Line 68: | Line 66: | ||
== | ==Examples of analogous efforts=== | ||
Currently consideration is being given to the process of argumentation on the web and the only too evident weaknesses of current methodologies. Examples are documented below. | |||
Examples | |||
* Implementing the Argument Web | |||
http:// | * http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2013/10/168171-implementing-the-argument-web/abstract | ||
Arguing on the | * Arguing on the web 2.0: (Amsterdam, June 30 - July 1, 2014) | ||
http:// | * http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.region.europe/10664 | ||
* Arguing on the Web 2.0 | |||
http:// | * http://philevents.org/event/show/12234 | ||
* 8th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation | |||
* http://cf.hum.uva.nl/issa/ | |||
| Line 95: | Line 91: | ||
# Norma Romm | # Norma Romm | ||
# Paul Hays | # Paul Hays | ||
# Heiner Benking | |||
# Gayle Underwood | |||
# Julie Freeman | |||
# Afonso Ferreira | |||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
===Useful Links=== | ===Useful Links=== | ||
* www.dialogicdesignscience.wikispaces.com | * http://www.dialogicdesignscience.wikispaces.com | ||
