R-I-Peers - Athens Virtual SDD Obstacles we face when designing and implementing GEPs: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
   |acronym=[[R&I PEERS]]                   
   |acronym=[[R&I PEERS]]                   
   |book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg   
   |book_image=SDDP_Report_Image.jpg   
   |report_title=[[Towards the identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation]]   
   |report_title=[[Obstacles we face when designing and implementing GEPs in R-I-PEERS - Athens SDD]]   
   |project=[[R&I PEERS]]
   |project=[[R&I PEERS]]
   |Triggering_Question=What existing practices can be identified to facilitate the development and implementation of Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) in academia and research organisations?  
   |Triggering_Question= What barriers or obstacles do we face when designing and implementing GEPs?
   |location=Rome
   |location=Athens
   |dates=7th November 2018
   |dates=2021
   |LeadFacilitator=[[Andreas P. Andreou]]
   |LeadFacilitator=[[Yiannis Laouris ]]  
   |AsFacilitator=[[Nagore Ibarra Gonzalez]]  
   |AsFacilitator=[[Marcus - Kevin]]  
   |author=[[Andreas P. Andreou]] [[Jordan Kent]]  
   |author=[[Jordan Kent]]  
   |editor= [[Yiannis Laouris ]]     
   |editor= [[Yiannis Laouris ]]     
   |total_duration=9 hrs
   |total_duration=9 hrs
Line 22: Line 22:


==Executive Summary==
==Executive Summary==
The Mutual Learning workshop “Towards the identification of best practices in the Gender Equality Arena within an organisation” was organised by [[Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche|CNR]], [[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute|CNTI]]  and [[Asociacion - Centro de Investigacion Cooperativa en Nanociencias - CIC NANOGUNE (CIC nanoGUNE)|CIC nanoGUNE]] in the context of the project [[R&I PEERS]] funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, on November 7th in Rome, Italy.
TThe Mutual Learning Workshop "What are the best practices to overcome problems, barriers, issues when implementing your GEPs?" was organised virtually (Due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the consequent sanctions and difficulties in traveling abroad, the consortium of the project decided to deliver the workshop virtually) over 4 sessions using Zoom on the dates shown below. The Greek partner, ISOTITA has sent the invitation 6 weeks before the event to many national, some international and all partners.
* 16/12/2021 (30 min) Preparatory for introductions and to explain the process
* 13/1/2022 (2 hrs) Collection and Clarification of contributions
* 20/1/2022 (2 hrs) Clustering
* 27/1/2022 (2 hrs) Structuring and Road Mapping
Yiannis Laouris, from the Cyprus Neuroscience & Technology Institute (CNTI) has served as the Facilitator.
in the context of the project [[R&I PEERS]] funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme,  


The workshop, which was realised using the participatory methodology of the Structured Democratic Dialogue (SDD), brought together fifteen (15) experts from the gender equality field representing universities, governmental and scientific bodies as well as enterprises to discuss the existing practices across Gender Equality Plans (GEPs).
The workshop, which was realised using the participatory methodology of the Structured Democratic Dialogue (SDD), brought together fifteen (15) experts from the gender equality field representing universities, governmental and scientific bodies as well as enterprises to discuss the existing practices across Gender Equality Plans (GEPs).


<br>
<br>
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) of the workshop was: </u><br>
<u>The [[Triggering Question]] (TQ) of the workshop was: What barriers or obstacles do we face when designing and implementing GEPs?</u><br>


'''"What existing practices can be identified to facilitate the development and implementation of Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) in academia and research organisations?"'''
'''"What existing practices can be identified to facilitate the development and implementation of Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) in academia and research organisations?"'''


In response to the TQ, the 15 participants came up with 29 ideas, which were categorized in 4 clusters. Following the voting process, 22 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
In response to the TQ, the XX participants came up with 54 ideas, which were categorized in 4 clusters. Following the voting process, 22 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
 
 
Cluster 1- Commitment:
Cluster 2- Resources:
Cluster 3- Knowledge-Awareness:
Cluster 4- Conflict with existing HR
Cluster 5- Inclusion of employees
Cluster 6-  Evaluation
Cluster 7- Not evidence-based
Cluster 8- Environment:
Cluster 9- Beaurocracy
Cluster 10- Insufficient Measures
Cluster 11-  Research
 
 


<br>
<br>

Navigation menu