R-I-Peers San Sebastian Virtual SDDP Best practices to overcome problems, barriers, issues when implementing your GEPs: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 46: Line 46:




Following the voting process, 20 (out of 29) ideas received one or more votes resulting to a ST of 62%.
Following the voting process, 20 (out of 29) ideas received one or more votes resulting to a ST of 62%.
Although this is high, one should take into account the small number of participants and ideas, yet all stakeholders received five votes each.
Although this is high, one should take into account the small number of participants and ideas, yet all stakeholders received five votes each.
15 were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
15 were structured to create the influence MAP shown below. <br>
Line 55: Line 55:


According to the participants of this workshop, the practices that appear to be the most influential were: <br>
According to the participants of this workshop, the practices that appear to be the most influential were: <br>
* Practice #6: (2 votes) Monitoring gender & diversity state-of-art, gathering gender disaggregated quantitative & qualitative data <br>
* Practice #7: (6 votes) Collection of gender equality data from existing admin database <br>
* Practice #16: (3 votes) Presence of females in the board to select new researchers <br>
* Practice #26: (3 votes) Try to attract more males in Gender Equality Committees <br>
* Practice #27: (4 votes) Introduce some basic gender curricula in STEM


The workshop was facilitated by [[Andreas P. Andreou]].
Level III, the busiest level of the Map together with Level II, is synthesised by four ideas all of which do not influence each other. In particular, Practice 16: Find allies/collaborators/people that share the same concern for the GEP (P16, V2, C4, LIII) which is influenced by Practice 29 located on Level VI as well as Practices 5 and 1; Practice 14: Recognition and Autonomy of the Equality Committee (P14, V2, C2, LIII) which is directly influenced by Practice 23 located on Level IV; Practice 15: Get help: objective information to be analysed by qualified people (P15, V2, C4, LIII) which is influenced by Practice 3 from Level V; and finally, Practice 11: Retreat (P11, V2, C3, LIII) which is influenced by Practices 5 and 1 located on Level V. Interestingly enough, all the ideas located on Level III significantly contribute towards the implementation of the ideas located on Level II which, as being observed on the Map, share the same box. In particular, Level II hosts the following four ideas: Practice 27: Trainings and collaborative workshop creating a collaborative environment (P27, V4, C1, LII); Practice 12: Get everybody on board, spread the word (P12, V3, C3, LII); Practice 7: Find the real cause of the problem / barrier (P7, V2, C3, LII); and Practice 13: Involve everyone at the organization (P13, V2, C3, LII). Finally, Level I is comprised by only one idea, that is, Practice 10: Introduction of quotas to promote and support women’s participation in all forms of decision making (P10, V2, C3, LI) which is influenced by the ideas deriving from Level II. Therefore, in order to implement this particular idea, an organisation should foremost make significant progress in implementing all the ideas of the Map.
 


==External Links==
==External Links==
[http://ripeers.eu/ R&I PEERS]
[http://ripeers.eu/ R&I PEERS]

Navigation menu