Copenhagen International Mobilisation and Mutual Learning (MML) Workshop: Difference between revisions

The theoretical grounding is that a high difference between the averaged scores for Impact and Probability for a particular idea is interpreted that, according to the participating stakeholders,  the specific idea has high impact, but it will only happen if the relevant stakeholders take targeted actions, i.e., low probability to happen without new intervention. This knowledge helps systems designers to produce more effective road maps, by focusing their efforts on actions that will not happen otherwise, and they have high impact. Next, they checked the feasibility of ideas that turn out to have high priority based on the previous analyses and promote those that are easier to implement (i.e., higher score in feasibility). The purpose of this experiment was to combine these scores with the influence weights provided by the Influence Maps to produce more effective road maps.