Planetary Dialogue SDDP on Rescuing the Enlightment: Difference between revisions

From Future Worlds Center Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Planetary Dialogue SDDP on Rescuing the Enlightment (view source)

Revision as of 00:12, 22 January 2024

2,720 bytes removed ,  22 January
Updated the text about cluster
No edit summary
(Updated the text about cluster)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
   |editor= [[Janet McIntyre]]   
   |editor= [[Janet McIntyre]]   
   |total_duration= 1 week
   |total_duration= 1 week
   |stats= 11 participants 49 ideas 9 on MAP
   |stats=Participants=11 <br> Number of ideas=38 <br>Number of Clusters=9 <br> Ideas received 2+ Votes=14 <br> Ideas with 1 vote=11 <br> Spreadthink=58% <br> Ideas on MAP R=9
   |isbn=
   |isbn=
   |link=
   |link=
Line 18: Line 18:


==Executive Summary==
==Executive Summary==
World history was made in a synchronous global interactive WebScope Dialogue facilitated by [[Aleco Christakis]] on the island of Crete, supported by [[Yiannis Laouris]] team located on the island of Cyprus on July 21, 2006 (www.loversofdemocracy.org). For the first time, the actual structuring phase of SDDP was implemented using virtual technologies with participants being geographically separated. A group of nine students of “Democracy and The Enlightenment” brought on from the Flinders International Asia Pacific Institute by [[Janet McIntyre]] in Adelaide, Australia, with other members of the Knowledge Management Team (KMT) spread over various locations in the USA ([[Kenneth Bausch]], an expert in systems sciences and Marie Kane, an expert in corporate marketing, located at Fayetteville, Georgia, Diane Conway, computer software and internet conference system operator, located at Paoli, Pennsylvania and [[Vigdor Schreibman]], reporter/observer from FINS in Washington DC).
World history was made in a synchronous global interactive WebScope Dialogue facilitated by [[Aleco Christakis]] on the island of Crete, supported by [[Yiannis Laouris]] team located on the island of Cyprus on July 21, 2006 (www.loversofdemocracy.org). For the first time, the actual structuring phase of SDDP was implemented using virtual technologies with participants being geographically separated. A group of nine students of “Democracy and The Enlightenment” brought on from the Flinders International <ref>https://www.flinders.edu.au/international</ref>Asia Pacific Institute by [[Janet McIntyre]] in Adelaide, Australia, with other members of the Knowledge Management Team (KMT) spread over various locations in the USA ([[Ken Bausch]], an expert in systems sciences and Marie Kane, an expert in corporate marketing, located at Fayetteville, Georgia, Diane Conway, computer software and internet conference system operator, located at Paoli, Pennsylvania and [[Vigdor Schreibman]], reporter/observer from FINS in Washington DC).


==Triggering Question==
==Triggering Question==
Line 40: Line 40:




==Clusters==
==Visual Overview of Clusters==
The participants clustered the 38 ideas into 9 clusters. <br>
The List of Clusters: <br>
Cluster 1: CLARIFICATION OF TERMS<br>
Cluster 1: CLARIFICATION OF TERMS<br>
Cluster 2: AUTHENTICITY<br>
Cluster 2: AUTHENTICITY<br>
Line 51: Line 53:
Cluster 9: MARGINALIZATION<br>
Cluster 9: MARGINALIZATION<br>


[[File: Enlightment_Flinders_Clusters_MAP-Clusters.png |thumbnail|center|600px|alt=Clusters]]
The diagram shows the clusters and the ideas that ended up in each category
<br>


[[File: RescuingEnlightment_SDDP_2016_MAP.png |thumbnail|center|500px|alt=Influence MAP]]
==Visual Overview of Mapping==
After voting the following ideas made it to the root of the tree: <br>
Idea 1: Identify success <br>
Idea 2: Trust <br>
Idea 20: Partnerships <br>
Idea 3: Use patterns of failure and success <br>
Idea 5: Transparency to build trust <br>
Idea 18: Communication  <br>
Idea 7: Relinquishing power <br>
Idea 14: Improving local governance using local knowledge <br>
Idea 15: Optimism and pessimism <br>


==List of Ideas==
[[File:Enlightment_Flinders_2016_MAP.png|thumbnail|center|700px|alt=Influence MAP]]
*Idea 1: IDENTIFY SUCCESS (Denise)
*Idea 2: TRUST (Denise)
*Idea 3: USE PATTERNS OF FAILURE AND SUCCESS (Denise)
*Idea 4: CONTACT WITH THOSE IN NEED (Geoff)
*Idea 5: TRANSPARENCY TO BUILD TRUST (Geoff)
*Idea 6: PROMISE KEEPING (Geoff)
*Idea 7: RELINQUISHING POWER (Geoff)
*Idea 8: HOSPITALITY (Geoff)
*Idea 9: EXPANDED NOTION OF ACCOUNTABILITY (Janet)
*Idea 10: RESPECTFUL COMMUNICATION (Janet)
*Idea 11: EXPANDING CONSCIOUNESS TO SEE CONNECTIONS ACROSS CONCEPTUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL AND SPATIAL BOUNDARIES (Janet)
*Idea 12: IMPROVING THE PROCESS OF RESEARCH AND MAKINGIT MORE DISCURSIVE AND ACCESSIBLE AND OPEN TO THE IDEAS OF OTHERS (Janet)
*Idea 13: IMPROVING THE CAPACITY OF POLICY MAKERS AND POLITICIANS TO BE INCLUSIVE (Janet)
*Idea 14: IMPROVING LOCAL GOVERNANCE USING LOCAL KNOWLEDGE (Jim)
*Idea 15: OPTIMISM AND PESSIMISM (Jim)
*Idea 16: HUMAN NATURE (Jim)
*Idea 17: METHODOLOGY (Jon)
*Idea 18: COMMUNICATION (Jon)
*Idea 19: CAPACITY (Jon)
*Idea 20: PARTNERSHIPS (Jon)
*Idea 21: RESPONSIBILITY (Jon)
*Idea 22: MIND OPENING (Paisal)
*Idea 23: BRAIN TRIGGERING (Paisal)
*Idea 24: LOOKING INSIDE (Paisal)
*Idea 25: ENABLING PEOPLE'S CAPACITY (Paisal)
*Idea 26: CORRECTING THE FAILINGS (Paisal)
*Idea 27: ENABLING STREET TRADERS TO HAVE MORE INFORMATION ON THE POLICY PERTAINING TO GOVERNANCE OF INFORMAL STREET TRADERS (Sudarmo)
*Idea 28: CORRUPTION AND LACK OF TRANSPARENCY IN MANAGING THE DAILY TOLLS COLLECTED BY THE OFFICIAL FROM THE STREET TRADERS (Sudarmo)
*Idea 29: ADVOCACY TO SUPPORT THE STREET TRADERS (Sudarmo)
*Idea 30: MARGINALIZATION OF SOME TRADERS BECAUSE OF COMPETITION FOR SCARCE RESOURCES (Sudarmo)
*Idea 31: TOP DOWN PLANNING BY THE GOVERNMENT THAT FOCUSES ON CITY AESTHETICS OR BEAUTY AND NOT ON THE WELFARE OF THE STREET VENDORS (Sudarmo)
*Idea 32: USING RELEVANT LANGUAGE TO STAKEHOLDERS (Vu)
*Idea 33: PARTICIPATING STAKEHOLDERS (Vu)
*Idea 34: BEING RESPONSIVE TO STAKEHOLDERS TO AVOID FORMALISM CONSULTATIONS (Vu)
*Idea 35: LEAVING OUT 'POWER ABUSED' ON THE DIALOGUE (Vu)
*Idea 36: CONDUCTING PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH (Vu)
*Idea 37: WE MUST BETTER DEFINE WHAT WE MEAN BY TWO KEY WORDS: 'ENLIGHTENMENT' and 'ITS FAILINGS' (John)
*Idea 38: WE WANT TO REFER TO THE ENLIGHTENMENT AND ITS FAILINGS (John)
*Idea 39: SETTING AND OBSERVANCE OF RULES OF MUTUAL RESPECT, FOR OTHERS, OTHER VIEWS, NON-HUMAN CONSIDERATIONS AND FUTURE GENERATIONS (Rob)
*Idea 40: MORE INFORMED UNDERSTANDING OF AND COMMITMENT TO CIVIL SOCIETY, IE IN THIS CASE, THE NOTION THAT AS AN INDIVDUAL, ONE HAS BOTH RIGHTS TO BE HEARD AND OBLIGATIONS TO LISTEN AND ACCEPT THE VIEWS OF OTHERS, AND TO ACCEPT THAT SOME POLICY DECISIONS CANNOT FULFILL EVERY INDIVIDUAL'S NEEDS OR WANTS (Rob)
*Idea 41: AN OBLIGATION ON ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS IN CONSULTATIVE PROCESSES TO BE FULLY (OR MORE) INFORMED, RATHER THAN 'COME AS YOU ARE' (Rob)
*Idea 42: FOCUS PARTICIPATIVE PROCESSES AROUND DIRECTIONS AND PRIORITIES IN RELATION TO 'CONUNDRUMS', RATHER THAN 'POPULAR VOTE ON SPECIFIC PROPOSITIONS' (Rob)
*Idea 43: DEMONSTRATE ATTITUDES AND PROCESSES THAT REBUILD OR COUNTER-ACT THE (PERCEIVED) DECLINING TRUST IN GOVERNMENTS AS REPRESENTATIVE DECISION-MAKERS, AND ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO ACTIVELY CONTRIBUTE DESPITE THEIR CYNICISM (Rob)
*Idea 44: NEED TO CHANGE ATTITUDE BOTH MEN AND WOMEN'S PART (Nadira)
*Idea 45: NEED TO AMEND THE EXISTING LAW (Nadira)
*Idea 46: COMPENSATION SHOULD BE MADE TO THE VICTIM (Nadira)
*Idea 47: A SUPPORT CENTRE SHOULD BE INTRODUCED TO DISTRIBUTE PROPERTY (Nadira)
*Idea 48: ENSURE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF EXISTING LAW (Nadira)
*Idea 49: GENERAL COMMENTS FROM PARTICIPANTS
VishvathaR
10

edits

Retrieved from "https://futureworlds.eu/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/26868...27155"

Navigation menu