CARDIAC: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Project Reports: 4.1) |
||
| (36 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Project | {{Project | ||
|acronym=CARDIAC | |acronym=CARDIAC | ||
|logo=Cardiac_logo.jpg | |logo=Cardiac_logo.jpg | ||
|project_title=CARDIAC | |project_title=[[CARDIAC - Advancing Research & Development in the area of accessible & Assistive ICT]] | ||
|contract_number= | |contract_number= 248582 | ||
|funding_period=01/03/2010 to 28/02/2013 | |funding_period=01/03/2010 to 28/02/2013 | ||
|coordinator=Patrick Roe | |coordinator=[[Patrick Roe]]<br> CNTI Coordinators:<br>[[Yiannis Laouris]]<br>[[Georgina Siitta Achilleos]]<br />[[Tatjana Taraszow]] | ||
|funding_agency= | |funding_agency=European Union for EPFL | ||
|total_cost=€57,790.00 (CNTI | |total_cost=€57,790.00 (CNTI Budget) <br> | ||
|partners= | €499,991.00 (Total Budget) | ||
|website= | |partners=[[Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne]]<br>[[Central Remedial Clinic]]<br>[[Cyprus Neuroscience and Technology Institute]]<br>[[Universidad del País Vasco]]<br>[[Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche]]<br>[[Evangelische Stiftung Volmarstein]]<br>[[John Gill Technology Ltd.]]<br>[[Smart Homes]]<br>[[University of Oslo]]<br>[[Technion - Israel Institute of Technology]]<br>[[Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas]]<br>[[Univesdidad De Sevilla]]<br>[[Universidade Technica De Lisboa]]<br>Associate partners:<br>[[GSA Information Consultants]] | ||
|website= | |||
}} | }} | ||
The project | The CARDIAC project aspired to develop a series of roadmaps for future research and development in the area of accessible and assistive information and communication technology systems by inviting relevant stakeholders and experts from across Europe to participate in three [[Structured Dialogic Design Process|Structured Dialogic Design Processes]]. | ||
The particular focus was on: | |||
*inclusive human-machine interactions | * inclusive human-machine interactions | ||
*network-based applications | * network-based applications | ||
*systems and services supporting accessibility | * systems and services supporting accessibility | ||
*the transfer process itself, which includes the transfer of technology and the making of the business case | * the transfer process itself, which includes the transfer of technology and the making of the business case | ||
Various techniques are being used including | Various techniques are being used including [[Structured Dialogic Design Process|Structure Democratic Dialogues]], Wiki discussion groups, experts' opinion and analysis of internally produced and external data, as well as direct contact with key players. | ||
===Importance=== | |||
The CARDIAC dialogues were very influential for the domain of Accessible & Assistive ICT because they have been used by the EC to choose and draft calls for proposals for Priority 7 of FP7, thus influencing the distribution of about 7 billion euros. | |||
===Geographic Coverage=== | |||
* Switzerland | |||
* Cyprus | |||
* United Kingdom | |||
* Spain | |||
* Portugal | |||
* Israel | |||
* Italy | |||
* Germany | |||
* Norway | |||
* Greece | |||
== | ===Links to the original Results=== | ||
The results of the dialogues of the project are available as follows: | |||
===Virtual CARDIAC SDD before Cyprus=== | |||
* http://virtual-cyprus-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com | |||
===1st CARDIAC SDD Pafos 2010 Accessible and Assistive Technologies=== | |||
* http://accessible-assistive-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com | |||
===2nd CARDIAC SDD San Sebastian 2011 Userintercation=== | |||
* http://userinteraction-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com/ | |||
===3rd CARDIAC SDD in Florence 2012 Network-based Applications=== | |||
* http://network-based-applications-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com | |||
==Accessible User Interfaces== | |||
For many people with disabilities accessibility of information and communication technology systems is determined by whether they can easily operate the user interface. In recent years there have been dramatic changes in user interface design particularly for mobile and hand-held devices. In some cases this has meant that a previously accessible device is no longer accessible. | For many people with disabilities accessibility of information and communication technology systems is determined by whether they can easily operate the user interface. In recent years there have been dramatic changes in user interface design particularly for mobile and hand-held devices. In some cases this has meant that a previously accessible device is no longer accessible. | ||
A roadmap is being developed to produce: | A roadmap is being developed to produce: | ||
*Clear proposals on what technologies need to be supported. E.g. Eye tracking, Voice/gesture reckoning, Wearable devices, Smart displays, etc. | * Clear proposals on what technologies need to be supported. E.g. Eye tracking, Voice/gesture reckoning, Wearable devices, Smart displays, etc. | ||
*Clear inputs on what methodologies have to be investigated. E.g.. Adaptive UI design, Accessibility evaluation guidelines (for devices, services and applications) | * Clear inputs on what methodologies have to be investigated. E.g.. Adaptive UI design, Accessibility evaluation guidelines (for devices, services and applications) | ||
*Clear contributions on what kind of tools should be developed. E.g.. Automatic accessibility verification/design tools, Accessible User Interface Description Languages, etc. | * Clear contributions on what kind of tools should be developed. E.g.. Automatic accessibility verification/design tools, Accessible User Interface Description Languages, etc. | ||
In recent years, a large number of international projects had to address the need for guaranteeing accessibility and usability in user-system interaction. To this end, a number of diverse approaches, methodologies and technologies have been proposed. Many research and development activities have been carried out on different aspects of accessibility of ICT equipment and services with an Assistive Technology approach, and more recently, the Design for All approach has been explored. | |||
Positive results have been achieved following both approaches. In particular, accessibility problems of specific groups of users have been addressed through Assistive Technology (AT) based adaptations, and systematic Design for All approaches have been elaborated and applied in various domains at a research level. Still, the field is currently in need of a breakthrough towards the adoption in practice of design approaches, based on the accumulated knowledge, leading to accessible and usable inclusive interfaces. | |||
Several research activities in the field of Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) focus on more user involvement in the design process. The ISO standard 13407 Human-centred design process for interactive systems provides guidance on human-centred design activities throughout the life cycle of interactive computer-based systems. However also other research methods are available, for instance participatory and co-design. These approaches have in common that they all express the belief that all people have something to offer to the design process. These approaches will also be part of our study. | |||
Moreover, adaptivity/intelligence on the one hand, and the analysis of the implications, from an e-accessibility perspective, of the emerging Ambient Intelligence (AmI) paradigm (with a clear orientation to creating "natural" interfaces) on the other, are becoming increasingly important aspects. The main difficulty lies in understanding and utilizing the whole range of possibilities for Inclusive Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). | |||
Therefore, it seems necessary to propose a road-map towards achieving inclusive HCI based on the accumulated experience by diverse European actors. This could be addressed through a network of multidisciplinary experts, who can bring in their expertise in the different aspects of the issues involved, as well as propose solutions, in order to elaborate a balanced model incorporating different approaches. | |||
==Systems and Services Supporting Accessibility == | |||
The market for Accessible and Assistive ICT products and services is complex and presents many challenges for successful technology transfer. It includes an array of supply and sale mechanisms, from direct sales to consumers to indirect supply in specialized fields such as Assistive Technology. The ultimate determinant of successful research in the area of Accessible and Assistive ICT must be whether or not a product reaches the market place and is available to consumers throughout the EU. It is clear however, that much, good, research fails to result in new innovations transferring successfully to the market place. Consequently in such instances, it may be argued that consumers do not benefit directly from investment in research. | |||
There are a variety of reasons why this is so, some of these are specific to the area in question, such as the complex supply chain in many countries, others however are more applicable to the transfer of ICT products in general, such as affordability, availability etc. On the other hand, a number of approaches and solutions are available that support the ICT industry in implementing accessibility into their products and services in various stages of products development, maintenance and service provision. These “solutions” comprise e.g. methodologies, guidelines, knowledge bases, hardware and software components, tools for modelling, simulation or verification, as well as interfaces to external assistive technology. | |||
Besides the application of such “solutions”, some industrial companies have established structures and procedures in their organisation that take care of accessibility aspects, be it a part of their product philosophy or just a matter of quality assurance. These can also include cooperation with other organisations from the same technological area, e.g. in associations like DIGITAL EUROPE, with research organisations, with user oriented organisations or with assistive technology companies. | |||
==Related Publications== | |||
* Laouris, Y., Michaelides, M. and Sapio, M. (2008). A systemic evaluation of obstacles preventing the wider public benefiting from and participating in the broadband society. In Pierson, j., Mante-Meijer, E., Loos, E. and Sapio B. Innovating for and by users, Brussels: COST Action 298. Chapter 14: 171-180. | |||
* Laouris, Y. and Michaelides, M. (2007). What obstacles prevent practical broad-band applications from being produced and exploited? In: Towards an inclusive future Impact and wider potential of information and communication technologies, Roe Patrick (Ed), European cooperation in science and technology. Chapter 7: 281-299. Available on-line: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c8297d4c-4f84-4651-8832-04ba3511a575 | |||
* Roe, P., Gill, J., Allen, B., Boyle, B., Heck., H., Siitta, G., Laouris, Y. (2011). Towards a technology transfer roadmap from the Coordination Action in R&D in Accessible and Assistive ICT (CARDIAC). Technology and Disability 23, 171–181 DOI 10.3233/TAD-2011-0325. | |||
* Laouris, Y., Siita, G, Roe, P., Emiliani, P-L., Christakis, A. (2011). Virtual Structured Dialogic Design as Tool for Analysis of Threats before Implementing European Dialogues Aiming to Identify R&D Gaps in Assistive ICT. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.): Universal Access in HCI, Part I, HCII 2011, LNCS 6765, pp. 492–497, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. | |||
* Laouris, Y., Emiliani, P. L., & Roe, P. (2017). Systemic evaluation of actions toward developing practical broadband applications for elderly and people with disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16, 247-255. | |||
==Dissemination== | |||
A roadmap is being developed to produce: | |||
* Clear proposals on what technologies need to be supported. E.g. Eye tracking, Voice/gesture reckoning, Wearable devices, Smart displays, etc. | |||
* Clear inputs on what methodologies have to be investigated. E.g.. Adaptive UI design, Accessibility evaluation guidelines (for devices, services and applications) | |||
* Clear contributions on what kind of tools should be developed. E.g.. Automatic accessibility verification/design tools, Accessible User Interface Description Languages, etc. | |||
==Project Reports== | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D1_2.pdf|Download CARDIAC D1.2 Production of Accessible & Assistive ICT Systems and Materials]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_TechnologfyTransfer_D2-1_SDDP_1_Paphos.pdf|Download CARDIAC D2.1 Paphos Report]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_InclusiveHCI_d2_SanSebastian.pdf|Download CARDIAC D2.2 San Sebastian Report]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D2.3_Florence_Report.pdf|Download CARDIAC D2.3 Florence Report]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_d3.1_Final.pdf|Download CARDIAC D3.1 Final Report]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D3_2.pdf|Download CARDIAC D3 2 Trends on Inclusive User Interface Design]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D4_1.pdf|Download CARDIAC D4.1 Materials needed to support the SDDP-3 meeting]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D4.2_final.pdf|Download CARDIAC D4.2 Final Report]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D5.4_Final.pdf|Download CARDIAC D5.4 Final Report]] | |||
* [[Media: CARDIAC_D6_4.pdf|Download CARDIAC D6 4.pdf 4th Bi-annual Progress Report]] | |||
==SDDPs== | |||
*[[SDDP CARDIAC I: Technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services]] | |||
*[[SDDP CARDIAC II: Influence Tree for the Road-map on inclusive HCI research and development priorities for WP3]] | |||
*[[SDDP CARDIAC III: Roadmap to exploit emerging network infrastructures and services to facilitate eInclusion]] | |||
==SDDP Reports== | |||
*[http://accessible-assistive-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com/file/view/Cardiac_Pafos_SDD_A4_20110218.pdf/406905392/Cardiac_Pafos_SDD_A4_20110218.pdf SDDP CARDIAC I] | |||
*[http://userinteraction-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com/file/view/CARDIAC_D2.2.pdf/395328022/CARDIAC_D2.2.pdf SDDP CARDIAC II] | |||
*[http://network-based-applications-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com/file/view/Cardiac_Florence_ReportV4.pdf/395509604/Cardiac_Florence_ReportV4.pdf SDDP CARDIAC III] | |||
==External Links== | |||
* [http://www.cardiac-eu.org Official CARDIAC Website] | |||
* [http://virtual-cyprus-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com Virtual CARDIAC SDD before Cyprus] | |||
* [http://accessible-assistive-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com 1st CARDIAC SDD Pafos 2010 Accessible and Assistive Technologies] | |||
* [http://userinteraction-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com/ 2nd CARDIAC SDD San Sebastian 2011 Userintercation] | |||
* [http://network-based-applications-sdd-cardiac.wikispaces.com 3rd CARDIAC SDD in Florence 2012 Network-based Applications] | |||
[[Category: | [[Category:FP7 Projects]] | ||
[[Category:Future Worlds Center Projects]] | |||
Latest revision as of 07:16, 17 January 2024
|
The CARDIAC project aspired to develop a series of roadmaps for future research and development in the area of accessible and assistive information and communication technology systems by inviting relevant stakeholders and experts from across Europe to participate in three Structured Dialogic Design Processes.
The particular focus was on:
- inclusive human-machine interactions
- network-based applications
- systems and services supporting accessibility
- the transfer process itself, which includes the transfer of technology and the making of the business case
Various techniques are being used including Structure Democratic Dialogues, Wiki discussion groups, experts' opinion and analysis of internally produced and external data, as well as direct contact with key players.
Importance
The CARDIAC dialogues were very influential for the domain of Accessible & Assistive ICT because they have been used by the EC to choose and draft calls for proposals for Priority 7 of FP7, thus influencing the distribution of about 7 billion euros.
Geographic Coverage
- Switzerland
- Cyprus
- United Kingdom
- Spain
- Portugal
- Israel
- Italy
- Germany
- Norway
- Greece
Links to the original Results
The results of the dialogues of the project are available as follows:
Virtual CARDIAC SDD before Cyprus
1st CARDIAC SDD Pafos 2010 Accessible and Assistive Technologies
2nd CARDIAC SDD San Sebastian 2011 Userintercation
3rd CARDIAC SDD in Florence 2012 Network-based Applications
Accessible User Interfaces
For many people with disabilities accessibility of information and communication technology systems is determined by whether they can easily operate the user interface. In recent years there have been dramatic changes in user interface design particularly for mobile and hand-held devices. In some cases this has meant that a previously accessible device is no longer accessible.
A roadmap is being developed to produce:
- Clear proposals on what technologies need to be supported. E.g. Eye tracking, Voice/gesture reckoning, Wearable devices, Smart displays, etc.
- Clear inputs on what methodologies have to be investigated. E.g.. Adaptive UI design, Accessibility evaluation guidelines (for devices, services and applications)
- Clear contributions on what kind of tools should be developed. E.g.. Automatic accessibility verification/design tools, Accessible User Interface Description Languages, etc.
In recent years, a large number of international projects had to address the need for guaranteeing accessibility and usability in user-system interaction. To this end, a number of diverse approaches, methodologies and technologies have been proposed. Many research and development activities have been carried out on different aspects of accessibility of ICT equipment and services with an Assistive Technology approach, and more recently, the Design for All approach has been explored.
Positive results have been achieved following both approaches. In particular, accessibility problems of specific groups of users have been addressed through Assistive Technology (AT) based adaptations, and systematic Design for All approaches have been elaborated and applied in various domains at a research level. Still, the field is currently in need of a breakthrough towards the adoption in practice of design approaches, based on the accumulated knowledge, leading to accessible and usable inclusive interfaces.
Several research activities in the field of Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) focus on more user involvement in the design process. The ISO standard 13407 Human-centred design process for interactive systems provides guidance on human-centred design activities throughout the life cycle of interactive computer-based systems. However also other research methods are available, for instance participatory and co-design. These approaches have in common that they all express the belief that all people have something to offer to the design process. These approaches will also be part of our study.
Moreover, adaptivity/intelligence on the one hand, and the analysis of the implications, from an e-accessibility perspective, of the emerging Ambient Intelligence (AmI) paradigm (with a clear orientation to creating "natural" interfaces) on the other, are becoming increasingly important aspects. The main difficulty lies in understanding and utilizing the whole range of possibilities for Inclusive Human-Computer Interaction (HCI).
Therefore, it seems necessary to propose a road-map towards achieving inclusive HCI based on the accumulated experience by diverse European actors. This could be addressed through a network of multidisciplinary experts, who can bring in their expertise in the different aspects of the issues involved, as well as propose solutions, in order to elaborate a balanced model incorporating different approaches.
Systems and Services Supporting Accessibility
The market for Accessible and Assistive ICT products and services is complex and presents many challenges for successful technology transfer. It includes an array of supply and sale mechanisms, from direct sales to consumers to indirect supply in specialized fields such as Assistive Technology. The ultimate determinant of successful research in the area of Accessible and Assistive ICT must be whether or not a product reaches the market place and is available to consumers throughout the EU. It is clear however, that much, good, research fails to result in new innovations transferring successfully to the market place. Consequently in such instances, it may be argued that consumers do not benefit directly from investment in research.
There are a variety of reasons why this is so, some of these are specific to the area in question, such as the complex supply chain in many countries, others however are more applicable to the transfer of ICT products in general, such as affordability, availability etc. On the other hand, a number of approaches and solutions are available that support the ICT industry in implementing accessibility into their products and services in various stages of products development, maintenance and service provision. These “solutions” comprise e.g. methodologies, guidelines, knowledge bases, hardware and software components, tools for modelling, simulation or verification, as well as interfaces to external assistive technology.
Besides the application of such “solutions”, some industrial companies have established structures and procedures in their organisation that take care of accessibility aspects, be it a part of their product philosophy or just a matter of quality assurance. These can also include cooperation with other organisations from the same technological area, e.g. in associations like DIGITAL EUROPE, with research organisations, with user oriented organisations or with assistive technology companies.
Related Publications
- Laouris, Y., Michaelides, M. and Sapio, M. (2008). A systemic evaluation of obstacles preventing the wider public benefiting from and participating in the broadband society. In Pierson, j., Mante-Meijer, E., Loos, E. and Sapio B. Innovating for and by users, Brussels: COST Action 298. Chapter 14: 171-180.
- Laouris, Y. and Michaelides, M. (2007). What obstacles prevent practical broad-band applications from being produced and exploited? In: Towards an inclusive future Impact and wider potential of information and communication technologies, Roe Patrick (Ed), European cooperation in science and technology. Chapter 7: 281-299. Available on-line: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c8297d4c-4f84-4651-8832-04ba3511a575
- Roe, P., Gill, J., Allen, B., Boyle, B., Heck., H., Siitta, G., Laouris, Y. (2011). Towards a technology transfer roadmap from the Coordination Action in R&D in Accessible and Assistive ICT (CARDIAC). Technology and Disability 23, 171–181 DOI 10.3233/TAD-2011-0325.
- Laouris, Y., Siita, G, Roe, P., Emiliani, P-L., Christakis, A. (2011). Virtual Structured Dialogic Design as Tool for Analysis of Threats before Implementing European Dialogues Aiming to Identify R&D Gaps in Assistive ICT. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.): Universal Access in HCI, Part I, HCII 2011, LNCS 6765, pp. 492–497, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
- Laouris, Y., Emiliani, P. L., & Roe, P. (2017). Systemic evaluation of actions toward developing practical broadband applications for elderly and people with disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16, 247-255.
Dissemination
A roadmap is being developed to produce:
- Clear proposals on what technologies need to be supported. E.g. Eye tracking, Voice/gesture reckoning, Wearable devices, Smart displays, etc.
- Clear inputs on what methodologies have to be investigated. E.g.. Adaptive UI design, Accessibility evaluation guidelines (for devices, services and applications)
- Clear contributions on what kind of tools should be developed. E.g.. Automatic accessibility verification/design tools, Accessible User Interface Description Languages, etc.
Project Reports
- Download CARDIAC D1.2 Production of Accessible & Assistive ICT Systems and Materials
- Download CARDIAC D2.1 Paphos Report
- Download CARDIAC D2.2 San Sebastian Report
- Download CARDIAC D2.3 Florence Report
- Download CARDIAC D3.1 Final Report
- Download CARDIAC D3 2 Trends on Inclusive User Interface Design
- Download CARDIAC D4.1 Materials needed to support the SDDP-3 meeting
- Download CARDIAC D4.2 Final Report
- Download CARDIAC D5.4 Final Report
- Download CARDIAC D6 4.pdf 4th Bi-annual Progress Report
SDDPs
- SDDP CARDIAC I: Technology transfer in accessible and assistive ICT products and services
- SDDP CARDIAC II: Influence Tree for the Road-map on inclusive HCI research and development priorities for WP3
- SDDP CARDIAC III: Roadmap to exploit emerging network infrastructures and services to facilitate eInclusion
